Please note that this type of agreement is provided for illustrating it only. It contains conditions representative of a cooperation agreement on fundamental research which contains provisions on the transfer of material, but any such agreement shall be subject to amendments based on the unique aspects of any cooperation. Confidentiality agreement (confidentiality agreement, confidential disclosure agreement) Normally, inventiveness is determined when the lawyer talks to the researchers. When a patent is applied for in the United States, care should be taken to ensure that the patent application identifies only the actual inventors (the researchers who make the creative intellectual contributions to the discovery). If a person who is not an inventor is named as an inventor in the patent application, this prevents the grant of a legitimate U.S. patent. The fourth section of well-written research cooperation is the budget. There is a tendency to consider this to be the most important section, since it documents the funding that the parties contribute. However, this is an unreasonable emphasis. While it is true that public sector agricultural research is severely underfunded and that, therefore, funds received from cooperation partners have an extremely important place in the overall research budget, related research should never be seen as a means of increasing revenues. Cooperation is much more than that. The focus solely on research funding neglects both the use of the agreement as a means of technology transfer and as a means of creating an effect of intellectual synergy that can result from the collaboration of researchers.
In collaborative research, many discoveries fall into CE2. A well-written research cooperation agreement defines how and by whom findings of ownership are to be made in cases where IP/TP is detected by either party. Another very important aspect is the installation of deadlines and benchmarks. Generally speaking, you want to have in the specifications at least an indication of the date by which each party must have fulfilled its responsibilities under any objective or sub-objective. Often, researchers will object that the specifics of the schedule put them under pressure, but such a plan will help cooperating scientists move forward in an orderly manner. It also helps prevent one party from having to wait for the other and causes a waste of time. Deadlines are important for experiments to run smoothly and help partners raise the resources needed to move the project forward. There are a large number of typical general provisions. These include a directive on advertising and publication, which deals with how the parties will communicate with each other and with the outside world; reports; confidentiality issues; important issues related to the management of intellectual property and the transfer of technology from the institution to the enterprise; administrative approvals; declarations of exemption and liability; dispute resolution plans; and termination provisions. This part of the agreement should also impose an amendment procedure and designate the persons responsible for the agreement in both the management and scientific directorates of the Institute and the company. .